🔍 Read the full analysis: The 6 Percent: Companies That Turn AI Into Profit on ThorstenMeyerAI.com
Get the latest gadgets delivered free with Prime
- Fast, free delivery on millions of items
- Prime Video, Amazon Music and more included
- Member-only deals all year
TL;DR
A McKinsey survey of 1,719 respondents found that 6% said their companies were high performers, attributing at least 5% of EBIT to AI. Other surveys also show a gap between adoption and financial returns, while researchers and analysts point to workflow redesign, data readiness and governance as factors that may shape results.
Only 6% of companies in a 2026 McKinsey survey qualified as AI “high performers,” reporting that AI accounted for at least 5% of earnings before interest and taxes, according to figures reported by The Register and TechTimes. A November 6 report by ThorstenMeyerAI.com compares that result with other surveys pointing to a divide between broad AI use and the smaller number of firms that report material financial returns.
McKinsey’s 2026 State of AI survey included 1,719 respondents. Thirty-seven percent said AI had some effect on their company’s EBIT, a share described in the source report as roughly unchanged from the previous year. The 6% figure uses a more demanding threshold: respondents’ companies had to attribute at least 5% of EBIT to AI. It is a survey finding, not an independently audited measure of AI’s contribution to profits.
A separate BCG study of 1,250 companies found that 5% were getting value from AI at scale, while 60% reported no material value, according to the source article. These survey results are not directly interchangeable: the studies use their own definitions of value and ask different samples. Taken together, they indicate that adoption alone does not show whether a company is earning a measurable return.
The report also highlights growing use of AI agents—systems designed to take steps toward a task rather than only generate answers. BCG respondents said agents provided about 17% of their AI value and expected the share to reach 29% by 2028. McKinsey survey results, as reported by The Register and TechTimes, indicated that 40% of companies with more than $1 billion in revenue said they were scaling agents, up from 27%. These are survey responses and expectations, not verified projections of future profit.
Infographic 01 · Who gets value from AI
Most companies use AI. About 6 percent profit from it in a big way
Adoption keeps rising. The share of companies that can show a large effect on profit has barely moved.
Share of McKinsey’s 2026 respondents who attribute at least 5 percent of their company’s EBIT to AI and call the impact significant. Flat versus 2025, as reported by The Register.
Wide use, thin profit
Different surveys, different bases: read each line with its source
Sources: McKinsey State of AI 2026 (n = 1,719), as reported by The Register, 25 Aug 2026 and TechTimes, 26 Aug 2026 · BCG, The Widening AI Value Gap, Sept 2025 (n = 1,250) · Eurostat, 11 Dec 2025 · Eurostat Statistics Explained (enterprises with 10+ employees). Survey figures are self-reported by executives; Eurostat counts use, not value.
Powered by Thorsten Meyer AI
Profit Depends on Workflow Change
The results matter because companies are moving beyond experiments and making decisions about where to put money, staff time and responsibility. If AI tools are added to existing processes without changing how work is handled, higher usage may not translate into lower costs, faster service or higher revenue. The report’s central distinction is between using AI and demonstrating a financial effect.
Agent systems sharpen that issue. A tool that reads an invoice, checks contract terms and prepares an action can shift work from employees doing each step to employees reviewing exceptions. That may change roles and controls as well as software. Companies need to decide what actions a system may take, who is accountable for errors and how results will be measured. The source material describes these as practical implementation concerns; it does not establish that agents will produce savings for every organization.
For workers, the evidence presents both productivity gains and concern about staffing. Eighty percent of McKinsey respondents who used AI said it made them more productive, while 39% expected job cuts, up from 32% in the prior survey, according to The Register and TechTimes. Those expectations are not a count of actual layoffs. The article also says cuts in the prior year fell well short of what respondents had expected, underscoring the difference between reported expectations and outcomes.
Popular right now
Dyson V15 Detect Cordless Vacuum
iRobot Roomba 105 Combo Robot Vacuum and Mop
Hisense 43-Inch E6 Cinema Series Hi-QLED 4K UHD Smart Fire TV (43E6QF)
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
Adoption Varies Across Europe
Official Eurostat data show that 20.0% of EU enterprises with at least 10 employees used AI in 2025, compared with 13.5% in 2024. Adoption was reported by 55% of large enterprises and 17% of small enterprises. These figures describe use, not financial performance, and should not be treated as a measure of how much AI contributed to company earnings.
The source article says that among European firms that had considered AI but did not use it, 71% cited a lack of expertise. It also summarizes Gartner forecasts that more than 40% of agentic AI projects could be cancelled by the end of 2027 because of cost, unclear value or weak risk controls, and that organizations could abandon 60% of AI projects lacking AI-ready data. These are forecasts, not observed cancellation rates.
The report’s practical explanation for the gap is that the work itself may need to change. BCG respondents associated larger gains with redesigning core workflows rather than relying on isolated pilots. The article also cites Gartner’s distinction between agents for decisions, automation for routine work and assistants for simple information retrieval. Those prescriptions reflect analyst guidance and survey findings, not a guarantee of commercial returns.
“The new promise is not “digitise the process” but “let software process the work.””
— Thorsten Meyer, ThorstenMeyerAI.com
Survey Results Leave Gaps
The reported figures do not establish that AI caused a particular change in company profits. The McKinsey and BCG results rely on survey responses, and the studies’ definitions of high performance, value and AI use differ. The source material does not provide audited company-level financial data that would allow the reported effects to be independently compared.
It is also unclear how many projects will deliver sustained returns after pilots, or how the expected expansion of agents by 2028 will affect profits, staffing and error rates. Gartner’s cancellation figures are forecasts, and respondents’ expectations of job cuts are not evidence that those cuts have occurred. Results may differ by industry, company size, data quality and the kinds of tasks being automated.
Companies Face Execution Tests
The next test for companies is whether they can move from isolated trials to measured changes in specific workflows. The source report points to selecting a limited number of use cases, tracking financial results and setting boundaries for agent actions as parts of that work. It also cites BCG survey results showing that leaders had deployed 62% of their AI initiatives, compared with 12% among laggards; the article does not provide enough detail to treat that gap as proof that deployment alone causes stronger results.
Gartner’s forecast puts project cancellations by the end of 2027 on the watch list, particularly where costs, expected value or risk controls are unresolved. Future surveys and company disclosures may show whether agent systems expand beyond early use and whether reported productivity gains become measurable financial returns. For now, the central evidence is a gap: AI use is spreading, but only a small share of surveyed companies report a substantial contribution to EBIT.
Key Questions
What does the 6% figure measure?
It refers to the share of respondents in McKinsey’s 2026 survey who qualified as “high performers” by saying AI accounted for at least 5% of their company’s EBIT. It is a survey result, not an independently audited figure.
Does the survey show that AI caused higher profits?
No. The result reports what respondents attributed to AI. The source material does not provide audited company-level evidence establishing that AI caused the reported profit effects.
How common was AI use in the European Union?
Eurostat reported that 20.0% of EU enterprises with at least 10 employees used AI in 2025, up from 13.5% in 2024. Use was reported by 55% of large enterprises and 17% of small ones.
What are AI agents?
In the source report, agents are AI systems that can take steps toward completing a task, such as classifying information or looking up records, rather than only answering a prompt. The report says their actions require defined limits and human oversight.
Are AI projects expected to be cancelled?
Gartner forecasts that more than 40% of agentic AI projects could be cancelled by the end of 2027 because of cost, unclear value or weak risk controls. That is a forecast, not a reported cancellation rate to date.
Source: ThorstenMeyerAI.com
